Fixture Design

Solar Bracket Fixture Mechanism

Three architecture iterations in one month to develop a robust bracket indexing mechanism for solar installation. Designed to work reliably in field conditions with dirt, dust, and grime.

Timeline 1 month
Role Mechanical Engineer
Industry Solar Automation
Iterations 3 architectures

The Problem

The automated solar installation system needed a mechanism to reliably index and position brackets during the installation process. The fixture had to work in real-world field conditions—exposed to dirt, dust, and grime—while maintaining repeatable positioning across thousands of cycles.

Previous approaches had struggled with contamination sensitivity and mechanical complexity. The new design needed to be fundamentally robust to environmental conditions while remaining simple enough for field maintenance.

Design Evolution

Rather than committing early to a single approach, I explored three fundamentally different architectures in rapid succession—each informed by the failure modes of the previous.

Iteration 1 Rejected

Finger-Actuated Lever-Slider

A rotational-to-linear mechanism using a finger-actuated lever to drive a slider. The lever provided mechanical advantage for actuation while the slider handled the indexing motion.

Too many moving parts exposed to contamination. The pivot points and sliding surfaces were vulnerable to dirt ingress in field conditions.

Iteration 2 Rejected

Cantilevered Flat Spring Sheet

A compliant mechanism approach using a flat-cut spring sheet in cantilever configuration. The spring provided both the retention force and the compliance needed for engagement.

Fatigue concerns with the spring geometry under high cycle counts. The stress concentration at the cantilever root was difficult to manage within the size envelope.

Iteration 3 Selected

Slider Pin with Cantilevered Plate

A long locating pin acting as a slider, press-fit with a cantilevered plate that drives the indexing motion. The pin provides robust alignment while the plate handles the compliant engagement.

Best balance of simplicity, robustness, and repeatability. The geometry naturally sheds contamination and the wear surfaces are easily replaceable.

Key Features

The selected architecture prioritized field survivability over mechanical elegance. Every design decision was made with contamination resistance and maintainability in mind.

  • Rugged construction tolerant of impact and mishandling
  • Agnostic to dirt, dust, and grime accumulation
  • Simple geometry with minimal precision requirements
  • Repeatable indexing without adjustment or calibration
  • Field-replaceable wear components

Results

The rapid iteration approach allowed the team to explore the design space quickly and converge on a robust solution within the one-month timeline. The final design has proven reliable in field conditions across multiple installation sites.

3
Architectures explored in one month
0
Contamination-related failures
Simple
No calibration required